Thursday, July 25, 2013

Pork Barrel Politics: 14 Republican Members of Congress Vote to Keep their own Farm Subsidies but Fail to Extend Nutrition Aid for Low-Income Families



Prepared by the Office of Congressman George Miller (D-CA)
Fourteen members of Congress with a combined net worth of up to $124.5 million voted last week to continue farm subsidies from which they personally benefit while allowing authorization for nutrition programs for low income individuals and families, including the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), to expire this year.
These members of Congress—each of them Republican—and their spouses have collectively received more than $7.2 million in farm subsidies since 1995.
Since 1973, Congress has always included both farm subsidies and nutrition aid in the Farm Bill, but after an embarrassing defeat on the House Floor late last month, House Republican leadership stripped the entire nutrition title from the new Federal Agriculture Reform and Risk Management Act that narrowly passed the House with only Republican support.
The resulting FARRM Act now provides $196 billion in farm subsidies, largely to the wealthiest farmers and large agribusiness firms. In contrast, 47 million
Americans are at risk of losing access to SNAP benefits if the program isn’t reauthorized, as is the case under this FARRM Act.
The 14 Republican members of Congress who voted for the FARRM Act and personally receive government subsidies have received an average of $515,279 in benefits, according to a database maintained by the Environmental Working Group.
However, these figures should be considered a low-end estimate. While commodity, disaster and conservation assistance programs disclose their recipients, federal law currently prohibits the names of recipients of crop insurance premium support from being disclosed. This lack of transparency means that it is impossible to know whether these and other members of
Congress have received subsidies from the crop insurance premium support program, or how much. Because of this reporting loophole, it is possible that, once crop insurance premium support is taken into account, these 14 members have received considerably more than the $7.2 million in handouts this report details.
In stark contrast, SNAP, which each member detailed in this report voted against extending, is limited to families with an income below the federal poverty line ($19,530 for a family of three). In fact, the average SNAP household has a gross monthly income of only $744, and their average monthly SNAP benefit is just $281.
In addition to voting to continue assistance for themselves and other wealthy farmers while failing to reauthorize nutrition programs for the poor, each of these 14 members of Congress voted in favor of the Southerland Amendment, largely credited with sinking an earlier version (H.R. 1947) of the FARRM Act last month. That amendment—which Republicans added to a version of the FARRM Act that would have already made deep cuts to SNAP and cut eligibility for 2 million Americans—would have completely gutted SNAP by giving states large financial incentives to kick families off the program.
It is time for Congress to enact a farm bill that maintains a strong safety net to help families buy food and get back on their feet—not one that provides large subsidies to wealthy farmers and agribusiness while leaving tens of millions of working Americans out in the cold.
The following are profiles of the 14 members of Congress who voted to continue their own farm subsidies while failing to continue nutrition aid for 47 million Americans.
Member Profiles
Each of the following members of Congress voted "Yes" on Southerland Amendment to H.R 1947 to Gut SNAP by giving subsidies to states that cut off families’ benefits and voted "Yes" on H.R. 2642 to provide farm subsidies for themselves while allowing authorization to expire for nutrition programs including SNAP. Total subsidies do not include any possible federal payments for crop insurance premium support programs.
Rep. Robert Aderholt
Republican—Alabama 4th District
Total Farm Subsidies Received: $207,426
Net Worth: $506,019 to $5,815,999
Individuals in Alderholt’s home county, Winston County, receiving SNAP Benefits: 4,201 (16% of Winston County’s population).

Rep. Blake Farenthold
Republican—Texas 27th District
Total Farm Subsidies Received: $1,205
Net Worth: $9,659,099 to $38,785,999
Individuals in Farenthold’s home county, Nueces County, receiving SNAP Benefits: 68,655 (19% of Nueces County’s population).

Rep. Stephen Fincher
Republican—Tennessee 8th District
Total Farm Subsidies Received: $3,483,824
Net Worth: -$1,149,999 to $204,995
Individuals in Fincher’s home county, Crockett County, receiving SNAP Benefits: 3,370 (22% of Crockett County’s population).

Rep. Vicky Hartzler
Republican—Missouri 4th District
Total Farm Subsidies Received: $516,000
Net Worth: $2,218,026 to $13,854,995
Individuals in Hartzler’s home county, Cass County, receiving SNAP Benefits: 8,664 (9% of Cass County’s population).

Rep. John Kline
Republican—Minnesota 2nd District
Total Farm Subsidies Received: $6,548
Net Worth: $248,009 to $645,000
Individuals in Kline’s home county, Dakota County, receiving SNAP Benefits: 23,736 (5% of Dakota County’s population).

Rep. Doug LaMalfa
Republican—California 1st District
Total Farm Subsidies Received: $1,710,385
Net Worth: $1,268,007 to $5,596,000
Individuals in LaMalfa’s home county, Butte County, receiving SNAP Benefits: 27,457 (11% of Butte County’s population).

Rep. Tom Latham
Republican—Iowa 3rd District
Total Farm Subsidies Received: $313,776
Net Worth: $2,315,175 to $7,650,167
Individuals in Latham’s home county, Franklin County, receiving SNAP Benefits: 1,100 (10% of Franklin County’s population).

Rep. Frank Lucas
Republican—Oklahoma 3rd District
Total Farm Subsidies Received: $40,613
Net Worth: -$264,990 to $1,059,995
Individuals in Lucas’s home county, Roger Mills County, receiving SNAP Benefits: 248 (6% of Roger Mills County’s population).

Rep. Cynthia Lummis
Republican—Wyoming At-Large
Total Farm Subsidies Received: $14,289
Net Worth: $7,252,036 to $30,584,999
Individuals in Lummis’s home county, Laramie County, receiving SNAP Benefits: 5,817 (7% of Laramie County’s population).

Rep. Randy Neugebauer
Republican—Texas 18th District
Total Farm Subsidies Received: $4,321
Net Worth: $6,560,080 to $19,129,998
Individuals in Neugebauer’s home county, Lubbock County, receiving SNAP Benefits: 46,408 (16% of Lubbock County’s population).

Rep. Kristi Noem
Republican—South Dakota At-Large
Total Farm Subsidies Received: $503,751
Net Worth: -$464,992 to $674,999
Individuals in Noem’s home county, Hamlin County, receiving SNAP Benefits: 462 (7% of Hamlin County’s population).

Rep. Marlin Stutzman
Republican—Indiana 3rd District
Total Farm Subsidies Received: $196,268
Net Worth: $14,019 to $1,082,995
Individuals in Stutzman’s home county, Lagrange County, receiving SNAP Benefits: 2,116 (5% of Lagrange County’s population).

Rep. Mac Thornberry
Republican—Texas 13th District
Total Farm Subsidies Received: $29,774
Net Worth: $241,007 to $580,000
Individuals in Thornberry’s home county, Potter County, receiving SNAP Benefits: 28,779 (23% of Potter County’s population).

Rep. David Valadao
Republican—California 21st District
Total Farm Subsidies Received: $185,724
Net Worth: -$30,099,998 to -$1,150,005
Individuals in Valadao’s home county, Kings County, receiving SNAP Benefits: 21,938 (13% of Kings County’s population).

All data on farm subsidies received by members of Congress and their spouses is based on analyses by the Environmental Working Group, which can be found at http://www.ewg.org/release/members-congress-received-238k-farmsubsidies and http://www.ewg.org/news/news-releases/2012/06/28/taxpayerspaid61-million-farm-subsidies-members-congress-families.
All data on members’ net worth is based on information provided in the Center for Responsive Politics’ reporting of lawmakers’ net worth in 2011, which can be found at http://www.opensecrets.org/pfds/overview.php?type=W&year=2011.
All data on SNAP recipients by county comes from the USDA Economic Research Service’s SNAP Time Series Data and can be accessed through http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/map_of_the_week/2013/04/food_stamp_recipients_by_county_an_interactive_tool_showing_local_snap_data.html.

No comments:

Post a Comment